If this is sincerely meant to be a "letter" and not self-serving polemic, the TERF accusation needs to be retired. Tulsi is a congresswoman familiar with the contours of this debate, not some impressionable 14 year old on twitter. Trans people are not a monolith, nor is anyone resisting the delusion that pre-HRT trans women are physically equal to women automatically "transphobic".
As for point 2, this is a false equivalency since (almost) no one is trying to stop trans men or even cis women from participating in men's sports if they are so able and willing. This legislation is about maintaining women's sports as a separate category with the purpose of providing women with opportunities that are near impossible to attain in a gender neutral space. As such it is perfectly congruent with the aim of including women in the military.
I suggest you look up "Battle of the Sexes" in tennis for actual data on what happens when men and women face off. It is entertaining, but not a competition. If women's tennis were not its own category, no one would know Serena's name.
Most teenage and college-age trans women are not far along enough in their transition for the effects of testosterone (which are less reversible than estrogen's) to have been reduced enough. Even post-transition, there is very little if any data proving that . Most of your links are self-referential to other social justice pages, or at most have an individual doctor's declaration as the "scientific evidence". I think we need to talk about facts before we can talk about transphobia.
The latter part of your article makes some good points about classism that may well have been the focus of this. In her video statement Tulsi gave the example of 80% of corporate women having sports backgrounds. So yes sports is closely tied with elitism in the way society is currently structured. But if you are so against the idea of competition itself shouldn't you rather boycott sports while creating this utopic "organized by weight" system rather than demand the breakdown of temporally-valuable womens-only spaces?
As for points 10, I have seen far more liberal men who are now vocal anti-TERFs because it gives them a chance to be woke and misogynistic at the same time. On 11, again, see the Olympic requirements: participating in men's sport is by self-declaration only, but participation in women's sport requires hormone level tests. Men's sports are not threatened, women's sports are, and as such it is irrelevant to this legislation. That alone should show you that this is not "transphobic" and that perhaps you have the direction of misogyny backwards.
Ultimately while this particular case is purely about physiology, I agree that it is also a philosophical problem. Nowhere in this or your Joe Rogan article do you address the varieties of trans experience, or that most women now labeled "TERFs" are not against all trans inclusion, but against radical trans ideology which is becoming popular and is a step removed from transhumanism. Unlike the picture you are painting based on token trans representation, a large subset of the trans movement claims that dysphoria is not needed for transitioning, and that anyone should be free to self-declare gender.
It is also a religious and spiritual problem - while feminists fought for decades to establish that gender is a social construct, trans ideology now claims that biological sex is a social construct but gender is innate to the soul. This does not align with Hinduism as much as you might think.
This article borders on just a good ole rant on the patriarchy and does not address the fundamental issues Tulsi is trying to address with her bill, however imperfect it may be.
You bring up a lot of unrelated issues and a ton of emotional manipulation to try to push your anti-patriarchy agenda. Did you even read your Hindu scriptures to understand ones gender is unimportant in leading a dharmic life?
In general males are physically stronger than females. To deny this is to deny reality! Male and female sports give females the opportunities they would otherwise never have. Similarly, maybe there should be separate categories for transmales and transfemales. After Tulsi fixes this issue, it makes sense to propose new legislation for trans sports.
Btw, can you imagine how transmales would fair in male sports?
In the meantime, thousands of young girls are are being deprived of the chance to shine in sports and obtain valuable scholarships since they cannot outperform trans girls.
You speak of being on the same spiritual path as Tulsi but you need to brush up on your Hindu philosophy. What is the best karmic action? You can't seem to understand that Tulsi proposal is in line with right karmic action - the action that benefits the maximum divine beings. There is an order of magnitude more females than transfemales.
gnrh inhibitors stall cognitive development along with puberty (see brills's 'the transgender child'), while sports trans-inclusionists want no regulation of 'natural' hormones
caster semenya is intersex and does have a performance advantage as a result, such athletes are overrepresented in women's sport, a world atheltics offical is accused of coercing another similarly-intersexed woman to get surgery to compete (and lost performance as a result)
it's not "fair" because sports are not fair, sports are cruel and about domination. if sports are to stick around inclusion means a space where females can know they can win.
So let me see if I understood this. Defending women's rights is now transphobia? Standing up for women is transphobia? Believing in biological facts is now transphobia? Please. Do better. If men's right to identify as women and take over women's sports means more to you than the rights of actual women, you're not a feminist, you're a men's right activist.
What is happening is that many conservative states are allowing genitalia to be checked at athletic events. This bill is banning that and saying that only a medical provider can do that.
Also, the US Constitution has what's called State Rights or State Preemption. Meaning that states can always add additional terms and protections for people than what the Federal government does.
If this is sincerely meant to be a "letter" and not self-serving polemic, the TERF accusation needs to be retired. Tulsi is a congresswoman familiar with the contours of this debate, not some impressionable 14 year old on twitter. Trans people are not a monolith, nor is anyone resisting the delusion that pre-HRT trans women are physically equal to women automatically "transphobic".
As for point 2, this is a false equivalency since (almost) no one is trying to stop trans men or even cis women from participating in men's sports if they are so able and willing. This legislation is about maintaining women's sports as a separate category with the purpose of providing women with opportunities that are near impossible to attain in a gender neutral space. As such it is perfectly congruent with the aim of including women in the military.
I suggest you look up "Battle of the Sexes" in tennis for actual data on what happens when men and women face off. It is entertaining, but not a competition. If women's tennis were not its own category, no one would know Serena's name.
Most teenage and college-age trans women are not far along enough in their transition for the effects of testosterone (which are less reversible than estrogen's) to have been reduced enough. Even post-transition, there is very little if any data proving that . Most of your links are self-referential to other social justice pages, or at most have an individual doctor's declaration as the "scientific evidence". I think we need to talk about facts before we can talk about transphobia.
The latter part of your article makes some good points about classism that may well have been the focus of this. In her video statement Tulsi gave the example of 80% of corporate women having sports backgrounds. So yes sports is closely tied with elitism in the way society is currently structured. But if you are so against the idea of competition itself shouldn't you rather boycott sports while creating this utopic "organized by weight" system rather than demand the breakdown of temporally-valuable womens-only spaces?
As for points 10, I have seen far more liberal men who are now vocal anti-TERFs because it gives them a chance to be woke and misogynistic at the same time. On 11, again, see the Olympic requirements: participating in men's sport is by self-declaration only, but participation in women's sport requires hormone level tests. Men's sports are not threatened, women's sports are, and as such it is irrelevant to this legislation. That alone should show you that this is not "transphobic" and that perhaps you have the direction of misogyny backwards.
Ultimately while this particular case is purely about physiology, I agree that it is also a philosophical problem. Nowhere in this or your Joe Rogan article do you address the varieties of trans experience, or that most women now labeled "TERFs" are not against all trans inclusion, but against radical trans ideology which is becoming popular and is a step removed from transhumanism. Unlike the picture you are painting based on token trans representation, a large subset of the trans movement claims that dysphoria is not needed for transitioning, and that anyone should be free to self-declare gender.
It is also a religious and spiritual problem - while feminists fought for decades to establish that gender is a social construct, trans ideology now claims that biological sex is a social construct but gender is innate to the soul. This does not align with Hinduism as much as you might think.
This article borders on just a good ole rant on the patriarchy and does not address the fundamental issues Tulsi is trying to address with her bill, however imperfect it may be.
You bring up a lot of unrelated issues and a ton of emotional manipulation to try to push your anti-patriarchy agenda. Did you even read your Hindu scriptures to understand ones gender is unimportant in leading a dharmic life?
In general males are physically stronger than females. To deny this is to deny reality! Male and female sports give females the opportunities they would otherwise never have. Similarly, maybe there should be separate categories for transmales and transfemales. After Tulsi fixes this issue, it makes sense to propose new legislation for trans sports.
Btw, can you imagine how transmales would fair in male sports?
In the meantime, thousands of young girls are are being deprived of the chance to shine in sports and obtain valuable scholarships since they cannot outperform trans girls.
You speak of being on the same spiritual path as Tulsi but you need to brush up on your Hindu philosophy. What is the best karmic action? You can't seem to understand that Tulsi proposal is in line with right karmic action - the action that benefits the maximum divine beings. There is an order of magnitude more females than transfemales.
Tulsi is a brave warrior! Thank you!!!
there's clear division of male-female performance starting in early adolescence https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-020-01389-3
hormones take ~2.5 years to show their effects (which they clearly have on the f/m body, not the gender id) in adults
https://amp.theguardian.com/sport/2020/dec/07/study-suggests-ioc-adjustment-period-for-trans-women-may-be-too-short paper here https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2020/11/06/bjsports-2020-102329.full )
gnrh inhibitors stall cognitive development along with puberty (see brills's 'the transgender child'), while sports trans-inclusionists want no regulation of 'natural' hormones
https://www.dropbox.com/s/sxo2stksk9yctq1/Including%20Trans%20Women%20Athletes%20in%20Sport_%20Analyzing%20Principles%20and%20Policies%20of%20Fairness%20in%20Competition.pdf?dl=0
serena williams has said that she would lose in the men's competition
https://youtu.be/ezwjJxXS718?t=259 (qued to 4:19)
caster semenya is intersex and does have a performance advantage as a result, such athletes are overrepresented in women's sport, a world atheltics offical is accused of coercing another similarly-intersexed woman to get surgery to compete (and lost performance as a result)
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/16/sports/intersex-runner-surgery-track-and-field.html
it's not "fair" because sports are not fair, sports are cruel and about domination. if sports are to stick around inclusion means a space where females can know they can win.
Hugh mungus
So let me see if I understood this. Defending women's rights is now transphobia? Standing up for women is transphobia? Believing in biological facts is now transphobia? Please. Do better. If men's right to identify as women and take over women's sports means more to you than the rights of actual women, you're not a feminist, you're a men's right activist.
You need to talk about your own homophobic misogyny
Nothing was banned.
What is happening is that many conservative states are allowing genitalia to be checked at athletic events. This bill is banning that and saying that only a medical provider can do that.
Also, the US Constitution has what's called State Rights or State Preemption. Meaning that states can always add additional terms and protections for people than what the Federal government does.
Thank you Tulsi!